Janet Asteroff
Twitter
- jastro: Haitian Orphans Have Little but One Another - http://nyti.ms/avrhLv - Worth the read for all of us July 6, 2010
- jastro: RT @carterlusher: Intel's Andy Grove on why startups/Silicon Valley are bad at creating US jobs http://bit.ly/b0gQFz - Worth reading July 4, 2010
- jastro: RT @ebertchicago: The tragedy of the Me Generation is that it was born too soon to use Facebook in adolescence. - Very well said! June 16, 2010
- jastro: Joan Rivers: Can She Talk!: http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=6554284n - Great interview with a Margaret Meade student June 6, 2010
- jastro: Is Obama the new Woodrow Wilson? June 6, 2010
- jastro: RT @ebertchicago: Amusing to Google "best novel by Charles Dickens" and find every one mentioned by someone or another. June 4, 2010
- jastro: RT @sagenet: http://www.healthymagination.com/ Excellent example of aggregating intelligence around ambition. Data driven + timely comme ... June 4, 2010
- jastro: RT @DaveHamilton: "I don't believe in a lot of things, but I believe in duct tape." #Lost May 23, 2010
- jastro: The Whole System Of Email Is Toxic http://bit.ly/9bBM8I -- Check it out -- it's a good read May 12, 2010
- jastro: Hillary Clinton to replace Justice John Paul Stevens? April 23, 2010
Coordinates
Stuff
- AttentionMeter
- Building a Visual Resume
- Cochrane Associates
- Code to Deflect NEOS
- Media History 1900-1909
- Oxford: Great Footage/Pix
- Pawn Stars
- ReadWriteWeb
- Teachers Marketplace
- The Geography of Jobs
- The Stanley Kubrick Archive
- Very nice artistic cubes
- Web 2.0 Tools and Applications
Recent Comments
- ChimeHost on ICANN OKs International Domains
- Polprav on A Critique of Consulting
- Megan Taylor on A Documentary About a Font
Archives
Meta
A Critique of Consulting
Published by admin | Filed under Uncategorized
Well worth the read – Lepore does a wonderful job of tracing the roots of management consulting and early labor struggles.
Not So Fast
Scientific management started as a way to work. How did it become a way of life?
by Jill Lepore
http://www.newyorker.com/arts/critics/atlarge/2009/10/12/091012crat_atlarge_lepore
“Whether he was also a shameless fraud is a matter of some debate, but not, it must be said, much: it’s difficult to stage a debate when the preponderance of evidence falls to one side. In “The Management Myth: Why the Experts Keep Getting It Wrong” (Norton; $27.95), Matthew Stewart points out what Taylor’s enemies and even some of his colleagues pointed out, nearly a century ago: Taylor fudged his data, lied to his clients, and inflated the record of his success. As it happens, Stewart did the same things during his seven years as a management consultant; fudging, lying, and inflating, he says, are the profession’s stock-in-trade. Stewart had just finished a D.Phil. at Oxford in philosophy when he took a job rigging spreadsheets to tell companies whose business he barely understood how to trim costs, and he feels sullied by it. This gives his acerbic account an edgy urgency, but you begin to wonder, given how he felt about it, why he stuck with it for so long (the money, the money). Anyway, now he’s blowing the whistle, telling entertaining and slightly shocking stories, like the one about how his boss taught his twenty-something trainees—Stewart reports that one in six graduating seniors at élite colleges is recruited to work in management-consulting firms—how to conduct a “two-handed regression”: “When a scatter plot failed to show the significant correlation between two variables that we all knew was there, he would place a pair of meaty hands over the offending clouds of data points and thereby reveal the straight line hiding from conventional mathematics.” Management consulting isn’t a science, Stewart says; it’s a party trick.”
asteroff
@jastro
janet asteroff
jasteroff
jasteroff

October 21st, 2009 at 8:12 pm
Hello from Russia!
Can I quote a post in your blog with the link to you?