Janet Asteroff
Twitter
- jastro: Review of Consent of the Networked http://t.co/0IQc8qWM February 5, 2012
- jastro: RT @ebertchicago: Kubrick's publicist, Mike Kaplan, remembers the first private screening of "A Clockwork Orange." http://t.co/VGO2R4K2 February 5, 2012
- jastro: @ebertchicago Only two stars for "Clockwork" - it's better than The Godfather. It's the true 21st centry film. Let's hope for a new review February 5, 2012
- jastro: RT @ebertchicago: "Upstairs Downtown Abbey." Some of the original stars in a video parody. They did it for charity. http://t.co/zqxPKcca January 29, 2012
- jastro: RT @ebertchicago: RT-ing my entry in this week's New Yorker Cartoon Caption Contest because you should enter too. http://t.co/WiRd3YVE January 24, 2012
- jastro: @ebertchicago Roger Ebert is a national treasure January 24, 2012
- jastro: @DavidCarnoy Best picture nominee "Midnight in Paris" was way overrated. I like Woody, but it was disappointing. Agree/disagree? AGREE! January 24, 2012
- jastro: @ebertchicago And the Phil Ochs documentary was great! January 24, 2012
- jastro: ."For Giffords, House Comeback Is One Too Many" January 23, 2012
- jastro: Thomas Edison's incredibly daunting to-do list written in 1888: http://t.co/Ucw6X26k via @ListsOfNote. Wow -- good stuff January 23, 2012
Coordinates
Stuff
- AttentionMeter
- Building a Visual Resume
- Cochrane Associates
- Code to Deflect NEOS
- Media History 1900-1909
- Oxford: Great Footage/Pix
- Pawn Stars
- ReadWriteWeb
- Teachers Marketplace
- The Geography of Jobs
- The Stanley Kubrick Archive
- Very nice artistic cubes
- Web 2.0 Tools and Applications
Recent Comments
Archives
Meta
A Critique of Consulting
Published by admin | Filed under Uncategorized
Well worth the read – Lepore does a wonderful job of tracing the roots of management consulting and early labor struggles.
Not So Fast
Scientific management started as a way to work. How did it become a way of life?
by Jill Lepore
http://www.newyorker.com/arts/critics/atlarge/2009/10/12/091012crat_atlarge_lepore
“Whether he was also a shameless fraud is a matter of some debate, but not, it must be said, much: it’s difficult to stage a debate when the preponderance of evidence falls to one side. In “The Management Myth: Why the Experts Keep Getting It Wrong” (Norton; $27.95), Matthew Stewart points out what Taylor’s enemies and even some of his colleagues pointed out, nearly a century ago: Taylor fudged his data, lied to his clients, and inflated the record of his success. As it happens, Stewart did the same things during his seven years as a management consultant; fudging, lying, and inflating, he says, are the profession’s stock-in-trade. Stewart had just finished a D.Phil. at Oxford in philosophy when he took a job rigging spreadsheets to tell companies whose business he barely understood how to trim costs, and he feels sullied by it. This gives his acerbic account an edgy urgency, but you begin to wonder, given how he felt about it, why he stuck with it for so long (the money, the money). Anyway, now he’s blowing the whistle, telling entertaining and slightly shocking stories, like the one about how his boss taught his twenty-something trainees—Stewart reports that one in six graduating seniors at élite colleges is recruited to work in management-consulting firms—how to conduct a “two-handed regression”: “When a scatter plot failed to show the significant correlation between two variables that we all knew was there, he would place a pair of meaty hands over the offending clouds of data points and thereby reveal the straight line hiding from conventional mathematics.” Management consulting isn’t a science, Stewart says; it’s a party trick.”
asteroff
@jastro
janet asteroff
jasteroff
jasteroff
